Home > Improve Lab > Quality Outcome and Monitoring System (QOMS)
Implementation Capacity Areas:
Quality Outcome and Monitoring System (QOMS)
Triple P implementation and scale-up activities rely on data to inform sound decision-making for learning and improvement.
Learn
How Do We Use Data for Learning and Improvement? Explore these resources to learn more.
Blended Implementation Science and Continuous Quality Improvement Information Guide
Building a Decision Support Data System
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Data Driven Discussion Tool – Triple P Program Selection
This tool helps lead implementing agencies, service delivery agencies, and intermediary organizations to consider data sources and ways to engage stakeholders in data-focused discussions about Triple P program selection.
Data Mapping Worksheet: Appendix
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Data Mapping Worksheet: Grand County DSDS Case Study
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Building a Decision Support Data System
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Data Driven Discussion Tool – Triple P Program Selection
This tool helps lead implementing agencies, service delivery agencies, and intermediary organizations to consider data sources and ways to engage stakeholders in data-focused discussions about Triple P program selection.
Data Mapping Worksheet: Appendix
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Data Mapping Worksheet: Grand County DSDS Case Study
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Apply
Find the tools you need to set up data systems, monitor your progress, and make decisions around what’s working and what’s not.
Building a Decision Support Data System
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Community-wide Triple P Fidelity Assessment Plan
This worksheet describes why Triple P fidelity is important and how to collect fidelity data to answer a key question that will drive improvement of the local Triple P program and implementation processes.
Data Driven Discussion Tool – Triple P Program Selection
This tool helps lead implementing agencies, service delivery agencies, and intermediary organizations to consider data sources and ways to engage stakeholders in data-focused discussions about Triple P program selection.
Data Mapping Worksheet: Appendix
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Data Mapping Worksheet: Coaching
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Community-wide Triple P Fidelity Assessment Plan
This worksheet describes why Triple P fidelity is important and how to collect fidelity data to answer a key question that will drive improvement of the local Triple P program and implementation processes.
Data Driven Discussion Tool – Triple P Program Selection
This tool helps lead implementing agencies, service delivery agencies, and intermediary organizations to consider data sources and ways to engage stakeholders in data-focused discussions about Triple P program selection.
Data Mapping Worksheet: Appendix
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Data Mapping Worksheet: Coaching
Building a decision-support data system can feel like a lot of work.
Assess/Measure
What do we need to know before we start? How are we doing?
Acceptability of Intervention
This resource provides an assessment of organizational readiness for implementing change.
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes: Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility
Developed by Weiner et al. (2017), these three measures can be administered to a wide range of stakeholders (e.g., parents, direct service providers, administrators) to determine the extent to which they believe an intervention (e.g., Triple P) or an implementation strategy (e.g., training, coaching, data collection, technical assistance) is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes: Accessibility
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can examine the degree to which local families can access parenting and family support in accordance with the level of support they need or prefer.
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes: Cost
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can measure the cost associated with implementing the Triple P program.
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes: Reach
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can measure how well the Triple P program is reaching eligible participant.
This resource provides an assessment of organizational readiness for implementing change.
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes: Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility
Developed by Weiner et al. (2017), these three measures can be administered to a wide range of stakeholders (e.g., parents, direct service providers, administrators) to determine the extent to which they believe an intervention (e.g., Triple P) or an implementation strategy (e.g., training, coaching, data collection, technical assistance) is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes: Accessibility
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can examine the degree to which local families can access parenting and family support in accordance with the level of support they need or prefer.
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes: Cost
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can measure the cost associated with implementing the Triple P program.
Triple P System Implementation Outcomes: Reach
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can measure how well the Triple P program is reaching eligible participant.