Search Resources
Triple P Strengths Checklist for Context
Triple P Strengths Checklist for Competence
Triple P Strengths Checklist for Content
Online Implementation Driver's Assessment (IDA-TP) with Score Report
The Implementation Drivers Assessment for the Triple P (IDA-TP) project team developed a measure of how well individual agencies within a community coalition support the delivery of chosen interventions from the Triple P—Positive Parenting Program. The IDA-TP includes eight indices, each covering a different topic related to implementation infrastructure and best practices. These scores are meant to be used for action planning and may develop or regress over time.
What are you going to see in this report:
- This report shows scores for each individual index on the IDA and the summary indices.
- For each index, you’ll also see recommendations based on the Service Delivery Agency’s score for that index. Recommendations will highlight potential next steps and key considerations.
This scoring rubric is not intended to replace the facilitated administration of the IDA-TP. The purpose is to provide a rapid scoring tool to help action planning and capacity improvement efforts.
Agency Triple P Implementation Climate Scale
This measure assesses the organizational climate for the implementation of innovations, as it is significantly associated with management support for implementing the innovation. (Adapted from Klein, Conn, & Sorra’s (2001) MRPTOO Implementation Climate Scale).
Triple P System Sustainability
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can monitor program sustainability.
Triple P System Accessibility
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can examine the degree to which local families can access parenting and family support in accordance with the level of support they need or prefer.
Triple P System Costs
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can measure the cost associated with implementing the Triple P program.
Triple P System Reach
This informational handout describes how community coalitions can measure how well the Triple P program is reaching eligible participants.
Triple P System Acceptability, Appropriateness, Feasibility
Developed by Weiner et al. (2017), these three measures can be administered to a wide range of stakeholders (e.g., parents, direct service providers, administrators) to determine the extent to which they believe an intervention (e.g., Triple P) or an implementation strategy (e.g., training, coaching, data collection, technical assistance) is acceptable, appropriate, and feasible.
Social Network Analysis
This informational handout provides a description of how social network analysis can be used in Triple P scale-up to help coalitions identify connections to other people, groups, or organizations and investigate how those social connections relate to the flow of information.
Triple P Session Checklist
This informational handout provides a description of and link to the Triple P Session Checklist.
Team Functioning Scale - Team Tension
Designed to be administered to individual teams within the community Triple P coalition, Feinberg et al.’s (2007) Team Functioning Scale for Team Tension is a single-item measure of team conflict and tension.
Team Functioning Scale - Leadership
Designed to be administered to individual teams within the community Triple P coalition, Chilenski et al.’s (2016) Team Functioning Scale for Team Leadership can be used as a measure of the degree to which team leadership encourages input and consensus, and promotes a friendly work environment.
Team Functioning Scale - Goals
Designed to be administered to individual teams within the community Triple P coalition, Perkins et al.’s (2011) Team Functioning Scale for Team Goals examines the degree to which teams have developed clear goals and governance procedures.
Team Functioning Scale - Focus on Work
Designed to be administered to individual teams within the community Triple P coalition, Chilenski et al.’s (2016) Team Functioning Scale for Team Focus on Work can be used as measure of teamwork orientation.
Team Functioning Scale - Culture
Designed to be administered to individual teams within the community Triple P coalition, Chilenski et al.’s (2016) Team Functioning Scale for Team Culture can be used as a measure of team atmosphere.
Community Triple P Buy In Scale
Designed to be administered to community Triple P coalition members (including coalition and agency Triple P coordinators and implementation team members, but excluding lead agency directors and service agency directors), the scale contains five items that assess the degree to which influential community leaders are committed to and champion the community Triple P initiative. (Adapted from Perkins et al.’s 2011 measure of community buy-in for local PROSPER initiatives).
Implementation Drivers Assessment (IDA-TP) Participant Copy
This measure assesses how well individual agencies within a community coalition support the delivery of chosen interventions from the Triple P.
Implementation Drivers Assessment (IDA-TP) Facilitator Copy
This measure assesses how well individual agencies within a community coalition support the delivery of chosen interventions from the Triple P.
Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory
Mattessich et al’s (2001) Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory assesses group collaboration across community partnership initiatives.
Organizational Readiness for Lead Agencies
This measure examines organization members’ psychological and behavioral preparedness to implement organizational change. (Adapted from Shea et al.’s (2014) Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)).
Community Readiness Scale for Large Initiatives
Chilenski, Greenberg, & Feinberg’s (2007) Community Readiness Scale offers an assessment of community readiness to implement largeāscale community change projects that involve several community partners. This scale may be administered to mixed samples of community leaders, service agency representatives, parents, and youth during a community’s initial readiness activities for scaling programs like the Triple P system of interventions.
Organizational Readiness for Service Agencies
This measure examines organization members’ psychological and behavioral preparedness to implement organizational change. (Adapted from Shea et al.’s (2014) Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC)).